In a crowded online-video ecosystem, raw audience numbers and engagement metrics are the clearest way to size up competitors. This analysis compares Tickzoo.tv with five domains commonly listed alongside it in public analytics: ztube.org, zoofilialovers.com, artofzoo.online, artofzoo.com, and zoobeeg.net. The goal is practical: show where audiences concentrate, how engaging those audiences are, and what the publicly visible SEO signals suggest about each domain’s stability and risk profile.
Audience scale: who’s drawing the most visitors?
Publicly available site estimators put Tickzoo.tv among the larger properties in this niche, with traffic estimates in the low-millions per month. One free analytics snapshot estimates Tickzoo.tv at roughly ~1.6 million monthly visits (about 53K daily), which positions it as a high-traffic destination compared with many niche competitors.
Ztube.org is reported in the same analytics services to attract a comparable audience scale, with figures indicating ~1.4 million monthly visits and tens of thousands of daily visitors — although some month-to-month volatility is evident in the public estimates.
Artofzoo.com and artofzoo-branded domains show mid-hundreds-of-thousands monthly visits in different estimators: artofzoo.com has publicly estimated ~495K monthly visits according to a traffic snapshot, while artofzoo.online is shown in competitive tools with several hundred thousand visits in their reporting. These figures put them below the top two but still sizable in absolute terms.
For zoofilialovers.com, some competitive reports list traffic in the 1M+ visits (monthly) range depending on the tool’s crawl and sampling assumptions. Beachhead tools that track “competitor” lists place it alongside ztube.org as an audience leader in this grouping.
Zoobeeg.net is less well represented in the main traffic estimators; third-party reputation and safety aggregators flag it for security and trust concerns, and independent review aggregators show few or no trustworthy traffic snapshots — a signal that public-facing metrics are thinner or the domain’s profile is more opaque.
Bottom line: Tickzoo.tv and ztube.org sit at the top of public traffic estimates for this competitive set; artofzoo domains and zoofilialovers occupy a second tier, while zoobeeg’s public footprint is less clearly measured.
Engagement and retention: pages per visit, visit duration, bounce rate
High visit counts don’t tell the whole story. Engagement metrics point to how sticky a site is and whether visitors explore multiple pages.
- Public estimators show Tickzoo.tv with relatively high pages-per-visit (several pages per session) and moderate bounce rate (mid-30% range on some snapshots), suggesting users browse beyond a single landing page when they arrive.
- Ztube.org reports similarly high pages per visit and long average session durations in some tools, accompanied by lower bounce rates (reported in the high-20s to high-30s by various estimators), which indicates deeper session engagement on average.
- Artofzoo.com shows lower pages-per-visit and higher bounce rates compared with the leaders, which is typical for mid-tier properties that attract visits via direct links or single-page entry points rather than sustained browsing.
Engagement figures from public, unaudited tools must be treated cautiously — they are proxies based on sampling and can differ widely from a site’s internal analytics. Still, consistent patterns (high pages/visit, low bounce) across multiple tools are useful directional signals.
SEO authority and backlink signals
SEO authority scores and referring-domain counts give a reading on how search engines might value a domain.
- Competitive marketing tools list authority scores for several of these domains in the mid-teens (e.g., authority ~15–16 for zoofilialovers and artofzoo.online in SEMrush competitor listings), which is modest but respectable for niche sites that rely on direct traffic and referral links rather than broad editorial coverage. Semrush
- Tickzoo.tv’s domain-level authority indicators vary by tool, but it appears to maintain a larger backlink profile and stronger direct traffic footprint than many of the sites in this group. Public Semrush/Hypestat snapshots point to hundreds of referring domains for the larger properties.
These mid-range authority scores imply these sites are visible to search engines for targeted queries but are not benefiting from the high editorial trust that mainstream publishers enjoy. That matters for long-term discoverability: gains from SEO are limited unless the backlink and content profiles change substantially.
Risk, moderation, and reputation signals
A crucial non-metric in this space is trust and safety. Several public reputation services and web safety aggregators mark certain domains in this competitive set with safety warnings or report thin SSL/WHOIS histories or limited third-party verification. For one of the domains (zoobeeg.net), security/reputation sites present warnings and sparse trusted reviews — a red flag for advertisers, platform partners, and some hosting/CDN providers.
Where reputation flags exist, they blunt the value of raw traffic: advertisers are less likely to bid, payment processors may impose restrictions, and major platforms can demote or de-index problematic content clusters. Operators of niche video sites therefore face a tradeoff between raw scale and platform legitimacy.
Strategic takeaways for stakeholders
- Audience depth beats raw reach. Tickzoo.tv and ztube.org show both high visit counts and deeper sessions — a sign that investing in on-site navigation and related content can pay compound dividends.
- Build backlinks intentionally. Mid-teens authority scores are improvable. Quality partnerships, editorial placements, and safer content signals can push authority upward and stabilize search traffic.
- Prioritize trust & compliance. Reputation flags materially affect monetization and platform sustainability. Any site that wishes to scale with advertisers must address security, transparent domain ownership/WHOIS, and content moderation policies.
- Treat public estimators as directional. Tools like Hypestat and SEMrush provide useful comparisons, but they rely on sampling. Whenever possible, validate with first-party analytics.
Conclusion
From an analytics standpoint, Tickzoo.tv sits among the top public estimates for audience size in this competitive group, with ztube.org close behind and several artofzoo-branded properties forming a second tier. Engagement and authority metrics suggest room for improvement across the board, and reputation/safety signals remain the single most important constraint on long-term monetization and platform partnerships. Public analytics tools are a good starting point, but any business decision should be backed by verified first-party metrics and a clear risk-mitigation plan.
